2009 has been the year of user-generated news. Twitter has finally caught on (after 3 years of using it and waiting for others to pick it up, I'm happy to see this). If I'm being totally honest, the last few major news stories that occurred, I found out about via Twitter. I think that's pretty amazing. I check Twitter maybe once an hour unless I'm involved in something (if I don't, I end up with 200 tweets to read). If I want up to the minute updates, I check the trending topics. And with each news event, I have been the first person I knew of among others who do not regularly use Twitter to learn information. I basically get all my news from the hive mind.
The Hudson River plane crash showed how a person's twitpic can hit CNN in the blink of an eye. The pope-tackling that occurred today showed how a cell phone video is not only good enough quality to make out what happens in a small screen with lots of movement, but also hits every news source in the blink of an eye. And the Iranian elections this summer showed the incredible importance of user generated news and content. In a place where no media got in or out, news was being passed almost solely through Twitter. There were so many important photos, videos, and tweets that came through. People saw they had the support of the world just from the sheer number of tweets. It really showed people what exactly was going on in this country in a way nobody had ever seen before. Sure, this has happened and continues to happen in other countries. But there had never been a social media movement for information in this way.
I say this because I came across a video on YouTube that I hadn't seen (I think we were on our honeymoon when this circulated). It shows a girl, Neda, immediately after she was shot while observing a protest on the street in Iran. The video is 40 seconds long and shows just after the moment Neda is shot, until a few moments after she dies. I'm so glad YouTube continues to host this video, as it is important to that people who choose to view it be able to view it. Neda isn't the only person to be killed in a senseless manner like this, but social media and activism pair with this horribly graphic video to remind us what happened there.
I've embedded the video below, if you want to watch it. Be warned that it is incredibly graphic. It shows a girl's moment of death. Please don't watch it unless you take a moment to consider that.
Thursday, December 24, 2009
Sunday, December 20, 2009
Avatar...well...this changes everything.
I got a chance to see James Cameron's Avatar on Friday night in 3D. It was absolutely amazing. After letting it settle for a couple of days and reading other reactions, I have a few thoughts.
The technology used in this film changes everything. It sets a new standard for motion capture, environment creation, and 3D (or REALD as they call it). The 3D is so much more effective than older 3D movies where random things just happen to pop out at you. Each scene is carefully crafted with things in the foreground more in front of things in the background. Instead of the novelty item flying at you, it adjusts the depth of field in every scene to make everything lift off the screen and come to life. At some points, you can focus on different parts the of screen as though you were standing in the room with them.
The motion capture accuracy is beyond the best completely cg character to date - Gollum - by far. When the Na'Vi move around, you don't see a computer generated character. You see the movements of the actors. The facial movements are so distinctly unique to each actor that at times, I honestly forgot who was CGI and who was human. They switch back and forth from Na'Vi to human, and you hardly notice a difference because their facial tics and subtle movements come through so much. The textures are perfect and natural.
And the thing that is possibly most impressive is that the entire world of Pandora isn't real. You start to think that it's so amazing how well the Na'Vi characters interact with the environment so accurately...then you realize it's because the grass, trees, every little leaf...is all CG. And it looks amazing.
The world itself and all the creatures in it were amazing in their conception and design. They're unique, creative, and beautiful. I loved how the forest interacted directly back with the Na'Vi - it flowed at their footsteps and reacted to their touch.
And the story itself was very good. It borrowed from a lot of different ideas, but what came out was something wholly new. I have read a couple of articles about how the main theme is "white guilt' - white guy is guilty for killing the natives and their land and stealing, so he becomes one of them and saves them. Let me be the first to say: NO. This is not the theme of the movie. It didn't even cross my mind, and it's ridiculous. This movie has NOTHING to do with race. It is not an allegory for white settlers coming to American and taking the Natives' land. The humans refer to the Na'Vi as savages, yes, but they also refer to the entire world with the same disregard. They are not interested in colonizing Pandora. Jake Sully mentions that Earth is a wasteland of concrete with no green left, but nobody really seems bothered by that to say that they are trying to colonize Pandora because they've messed up their own world. They are driven by money, greed, and power. They want the expensive rock found on Pandora so they can be insanely rich and in turn have more stuff and more power, likely to build higher and better things on Earth. The theme is corruption caused by money, power, and greed, and making a choice against those things to save yourself and those things that truly matter: love, nature, the planet, and your beliefs. I hope white people stop trying to make everything about white people. Newsflash: nobody cares.
Avatar truly changes everything in the world of 3D movies. I'm very interested to see where it all goes from here.
And a word of advice: I've seen a lot of reviews out there that are just not right. The people writing them seem to have decided a long time ago that they were going to hate the movie, due to hating James Cameron, hating hype, or who knows what. Their cynicism shines through. And some people just don't like stories of fantasy and science fiction. Please don't let reviews decide anything for you. If you are interested in this film, just go see it and draw your own conclusions. And for the record, that goes for ALL films.
The technology used in this film changes everything. It sets a new standard for motion capture, environment creation, and 3D (or REALD as they call it). The 3D is so much more effective than older 3D movies where random things just happen to pop out at you. Each scene is carefully crafted with things in the foreground more in front of things in the background. Instead of the novelty item flying at you, it adjusts the depth of field in every scene to make everything lift off the screen and come to life. At some points, you can focus on different parts the of screen as though you were standing in the room with them.
The motion capture accuracy is beyond the best completely cg character to date - Gollum - by far. When the Na'Vi move around, you don't see a computer generated character. You see the movements of the actors. The facial movements are so distinctly unique to each actor that at times, I honestly forgot who was CGI and who was human. They switch back and forth from Na'Vi to human, and you hardly notice a difference because their facial tics and subtle movements come through so much. The textures are perfect and natural.
And the thing that is possibly most impressive is that the entire world of Pandora isn't real. You start to think that it's so amazing how well the Na'Vi characters interact with the environment so accurately...then you realize it's because the grass, trees, every little leaf...is all CG. And it looks amazing.
The world itself and all the creatures in it were amazing in their conception and design. They're unique, creative, and beautiful. I loved how the forest interacted directly back with the Na'Vi - it flowed at their footsteps and reacted to their touch.
And the story itself was very good. It borrowed from a lot of different ideas, but what came out was something wholly new. I have read a couple of articles about how the main theme is "white guilt' - white guy is guilty for killing the natives and their land and stealing, so he becomes one of them and saves them. Let me be the first to say: NO. This is not the theme of the movie. It didn't even cross my mind, and it's ridiculous. This movie has NOTHING to do with race. It is not an allegory for white settlers coming to American and taking the Natives' land. The humans refer to the Na'Vi as savages, yes, but they also refer to the entire world with the same disregard. They are not interested in colonizing Pandora. Jake Sully mentions that Earth is a wasteland of concrete with no green left, but nobody really seems bothered by that to say that they are trying to colonize Pandora because they've messed up their own world. They are driven by money, greed, and power. They want the expensive rock found on Pandora so they can be insanely rich and in turn have more stuff and more power, likely to build higher and better things on Earth. The theme is corruption caused by money, power, and greed, and making a choice against those things to save yourself and those things that truly matter: love, nature, the planet, and your beliefs. I hope white people stop trying to make everything about white people. Newsflash: nobody cares.
Avatar truly changes everything in the world of 3D movies. I'm very interested to see where it all goes from here.
And a word of advice: I've seen a lot of reviews out there that are just not right. The people writing them seem to have decided a long time ago that they were going to hate the movie, due to hating James Cameron, hating hype, or who knows what. Their cynicism shines through. And some people just don't like stories of fantasy and science fiction. Please don't let reviews decide anything for you. If you are interested in this film, just go see it and draw your own conclusions. And for the record, that goes for ALL films.
Friday, December 11, 2009
Shooting video with DSLRs
Something I've recently been enlightened to is shooting HD video on DSLR cameras. I had no idea people did this professional. I always thought that since video was an afterthought added to these cameras, that it would be crappy and not work right.
Then I started reading a lot of professional blogs with people testing and using these cameras for video. They've built special mounts for them, special add-ons, equipment, etc. They're constantly improving the workflow. They've posted lots of tests that have totally convinced me that I need a DSLR for ANOTHER reason now. A great example of how well some of these cameras operate, particularly in low light, look at Vincent Laforet's "Nocturne". Not only can you get crisp video with such a huge control on DoF, you don't even need lights with some of these cameras.
Today I saw Phillip Bloom's test footage that he shot at Skywalker Ranch. They asked him to come and show them how to use DSLRs properly and test out the footage on their 40 foot screen. Here's what he came up with:
Skywalker Ranch from Philip Bloom on Vimeo.
It's freakin' amazing what you can get out of the DSLR.
Then I started reading a lot of professional blogs with people testing and using these cameras for video. They've built special mounts for them, special add-ons, equipment, etc. They're constantly improving the workflow. They've posted lots of tests that have totally convinced me that I need a DSLR for ANOTHER reason now. A great example of how well some of these cameras operate, particularly in low light, look at Vincent Laforet's "Nocturne". Not only can you get crisp video with such a huge control on DoF, you don't even need lights with some of these cameras.
Today I saw Phillip Bloom's test footage that he shot at Skywalker Ranch. They asked him to come and show them how to use DSLRs properly and test out the footage on their 40 foot screen. Here's what he came up with:
Skywalker Ranch from Philip Bloom on Vimeo.
It's freakin' amazing what you can get out of the DSLR.
Sunday, December 6, 2009
top 12 films of the 00's
the 00’s are almost over now that it’s december, and i keep seeing top ten lists. i want in on it. so here are my top TWELVE movies of the decade. because i’m cool and i get an extra couple. this is my personal top twelve and i picked them based partially on how influential they were (particularly to me).
District 9 (2009)
I think District 9 is an important film in 2 ways. The first is that it’s exploring topics that many people don’t really consider happening in today’s world. It’s commentary on the political and economical situation that South Africa is in. It’s very raw and terrifying and doesn’t hold back. It’s a movie you watch and don’t immediately wish to watch again because it’s painful and make you think. The other way D9 is important is from a filmmaker’s perspective. It made tons of money and cost pennies to make in comparison with Hollywood blockbusters. It was directed by a brand new director with no experience, showing how possible it is for people to be seen and recognized with today’s very connected world. It was shot primarily on RED cameras – digital video, not film. It was on location in Johannesburg, with real residents on camera being asked about their opinion of the actual events taking place in some parts, and through editing it seems as though they’re talking about aliens. I think District 9 is the direction cinema is going – making it more available to everyone.
Dancer in the Dark (2000)
Before this film, I’d never seen a “musical” with a dark side. I’d never really seen a movie with such a hopeless storyline. It was a break from the conventional and mostly uplifting films around this time. I had begun to listen to Bjork a little before this, and this solidified my fandom. Also, watching and reading things about the making of the film and learning about the methods of Lars von Trier was changing to me, and also interesting because he was a part of the filmmaking movement I attempted to emulate almost 10 years later as the end of my college career.
Memento (2000)
This was another film that changed the way I thought about film at a time when I was just starting to learn about filmmaking. The convention of telling a story from the end to the beginning, and still having the same kind of three act structure was pretty amazing. I watched it sometime within the last year or two and even then I discovered something new about it. And of course it introduced me to Christopher Nolan.
Le fabuleux destin d’Amélie Poulain (2001)
Even though these movies are in no particular order, this has been my favorite movie since I saw it in like 2002. I loved the storybook quality of it, the breakaways from the main story to little short tidbits that really opened up Amelie’s world, and just how nice and fuzzy it was. I loved the storyline of a somewhat isolated and different girl and how she sees the world. I think my favorite sequences were when characters would be introduced by what they liked and didn’t like. Amelie is about appreciating the tiny things in life and not letting your various psychoses instilled upon you in childhood by your parents or in adulthood by your health prevent you from living. I also loved the color quality and I think this movie alone made me love color grading.
Eternal Sunshine of the Spotless Mind (2004)
The weird thing about this movie is sometime before casting had even begun, I somehow found the script of this movie online and read the whole thing. And I thought then that it would be amazing. It’s another movie with unconventional storytelling, with Joel’s mind being erased of all traces of his ex-girlfriend. It’s another one that made me think more three dimensionally about how I could tell and edit a story. The story itself was so amazingly good too.
Lord of the Rings (2001, 2002, 2003) (this counts as one)
This is a no brainer. It came out in the middle of a time when I was really learning more and more about editing. It doesn’t change the conventions of filmmaking, but it was so epic in scale that it was one of the main inspirations to pursue a career as an editor. The endless supply of behind the scenes stuff (that I still haven’t seen completely because there is hours and hours of it) allowed Peter Jackson to make the creation of this movie a transparent experience for anyone that was interested. It was fun to read the books and predict how sections would be adapted, or think about why parts were changed and why book actions don’t translate to film every time. This movie was a culmination of everything I loved, and it made HUGE projects seem more possible.
The Dark Knight (2008)
The 00’s re-defined the superhero movie genre, and this is the centerpiece. It changed the way people thought about how superhero movies could be. And it’s Christopher Nolan again. It took chances, stayed more true to the original graphic novel, and is kind of an example of how dark movies got in this decade.
Children of Men (2006)
This is another dark dark movie of the 00’s, but it ended happily (sort of). The story itself was great and horrifying. And the filmmaking was beyond what I expected – the long takes with so many people in them and so much action going on. I remember the longest long take toward the end of the film, I realized it in the theater that the shot had been running for at least several minutes now. I think this film is the first film since Dancer in the Dark to actually make me feel literally depressed.
Garden State (2004)
This was an interesting film to view just before leaving home, because it was about returning to home after being away for a while. It also changed the way I considered music in film, as it had one of the best soundtracks of any movie and introduced me to a lot of the music I listened to in college. I find it kind of parallels a lot of what I experienced after I left home. I should watch it again soon.
Monsters Inc (2001)
I could only put one Pixar on here really (because that could be a whole ‘nother top ten), so instead of picking my favorite – Ratatouille – I picked this. It was another film early on with Pixar that really showed the world what they were capable of before it really was totally convinced. This was the first of their films to showcase CG hair, and the story itself was so original and amazing that it set the tone for the rest of their films.
Once (2006)
I picked this film to represent all the indie films I saw over the course the decade. This one was inspirational to me because the main actors were not actors, but musicians. The film was shot on location with no permits, and it was shot incognito so that nobody knew that a scene was happening on the street and therefore nobody would get kicked out of the area. That kind of guerilla filmmaking make me happy, because it’s possible for me too.
Superbad (2007)
I had to put a live action comedy on here, and it had to be a Judd Apatow film because his comedies totally stole the decade. This film reminds me of high school in a way, though I never went to parties or got drunk. It reminds me of the kind of moronic things I spent all night doing in high school. It also kind of reminds me of the time right before the end of high school. This film is also such a great example of a good comedy.
District 9 (2009)
I think District 9 is an important film in 2 ways. The first is that it’s exploring topics that many people don’t really consider happening in today’s world. It’s commentary on the political and economical situation that South Africa is in. It’s very raw and terrifying and doesn’t hold back. It’s a movie you watch and don’t immediately wish to watch again because it’s painful and make you think. The other way D9 is important is from a filmmaker’s perspective. It made tons of money and cost pennies to make in comparison with Hollywood blockbusters. It was directed by a brand new director with no experience, showing how possible it is for people to be seen and recognized with today’s very connected world. It was shot primarily on RED cameras – digital video, not film. It was on location in Johannesburg, with real residents on camera being asked about their opinion of the actual events taking place in some parts, and through editing it seems as though they’re talking about aliens. I think District 9 is the direction cinema is going – making it more available to everyone.
Dancer in the Dark (2000)
Before this film, I’d never seen a “musical” with a dark side. I’d never really seen a movie with such a hopeless storyline. It was a break from the conventional and mostly uplifting films around this time. I had begun to listen to Bjork a little before this, and this solidified my fandom. Also, watching and reading things about the making of the film and learning about the methods of Lars von Trier was changing to me, and also interesting because he was a part of the filmmaking movement I attempted to emulate almost 10 years later as the end of my college career.
Memento (2000)
This was another film that changed the way I thought about film at a time when I was just starting to learn about filmmaking. The convention of telling a story from the end to the beginning, and still having the same kind of three act structure was pretty amazing. I watched it sometime within the last year or two and even then I discovered something new about it. And of course it introduced me to Christopher Nolan.
Le fabuleux destin d’Amélie Poulain (2001)
Even though these movies are in no particular order, this has been my favorite movie since I saw it in like 2002. I loved the storybook quality of it, the breakaways from the main story to little short tidbits that really opened up Amelie’s world, and just how nice and fuzzy it was. I loved the storyline of a somewhat isolated and different girl and how she sees the world. I think my favorite sequences were when characters would be introduced by what they liked and didn’t like. Amelie is about appreciating the tiny things in life and not letting your various psychoses instilled upon you in childhood by your parents or in adulthood by your health prevent you from living. I also loved the color quality and I think this movie alone made me love color grading.
Eternal Sunshine of the Spotless Mind (2004)
The weird thing about this movie is sometime before casting had even begun, I somehow found the script of this movie online and read the whole thing. And I thought then that it would be amazing. It’s another movie with unconventional storytelling, with Joel’s mind being erased of all traces of his ex-girlfriend. It’s another one that made me think more three dimensionally about how I could tell and edit a story. The story itself was so amazingly good too.
Lord of the Rings (2001, 2002, 2003) (this counts as one)
This is a no brainer. It came out in the middle of a time when I was really learning more and more about editing. It doesn’t change the conventions of filmmaking, but it was so epic in scale that it was one of the main inspirations to pursue a career as an editor. The endless supply of behind the scenes stuff (that I still haven’t seen completely because there is hours and hours of it) allowed Peter Jackson to make the creation of this movie a transparent experience for anyone that was interested. It was fun to read the books and predict how sections would be adapted, or think about why parts were changed and why book actions don’t translate to film every time. This movie was a culmination of everything I loved, and it made HUGE projects seem more possible.
The Dark Knight (2008)
The 00’s re-defined the superhero movie genre, and this is the centerpiece. It changed the way people thought about how superhero movies could be. And it’s Christopher Nolan again. It took chances, stayed more true to the original graphic novel, and is kind of an example of how dark movies got in this decade.
Children of Men (2006)
This is another dark dark movie of the 00’s, but it ended happily (sort of). The story itself was great and horrifying. And the filmmaking was beyond what I expected – the long takes with so many people in them and so much action going on. I remember the longest long take toward the end of the film, I realized it in the theater that the shot had been running for at least several minutes now. I think this film is the first film since Dancer in the Dark to actually make me feel literally depressed.
Garden State (2004)
This was an interesting film to view just before leaving home, because it was about returning to home after being away for a while. It also changed the way I considered music in film, as it had one of the best soundtracks of any movie and introduced me to a lot of the music I listened to in college. I find it kind of parallels a lot of what I experienced after I left home. I should watch it again soon.
Monsters Inc (2001)
I could only put one Pixar on here really (because that could be a whole ‘nother top ten), so instead of picking my favorite – Ratatouille – I picked this. It was another film early on with Pixar that really showed the world what they were capable of before it really was totally convinced. This was the first of their films to showcase CG hair, and the story itself was so original and amazing that it set the tone for the rest of their films.
Once (2006)
I picked this film to represent all the indie films I saw over the course the decade. This one was inspirational to me because the main actors were not actors, but musicians. The film was shot on location with no permits, and it was shot incognito so that nobody knew that a scene was happening on the street and therefore nobody would get kicked out of the area. That kind of guerilla filmmaking make me happy, because it’s possible for me too.
Superbad (2007)
I had to put a live action comedy on here, and it had to be a Judd Apatow film because his comedies totally stole the decade. This film reminds me of high school in a way, though I never went to parties or got drunk. It reminds me of the kind of moronic things I spent all night doing in high school. It also kind of reminds me of the time right before the end of high school. This film is also such a great example of a good comedy.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)